1 in 7 people
are estimated to have been exposed to conflict so far in 2024
i
A population is classed as exposed if it is within 5km of a political violence event
50 countries
rank in the index categories for extreme, high, or turbulent levels of conflict
i
All countries receive an Index score and 50 meet the top three categories
Palestine, Myanmar, Syria, and Mexico
hold the highest positions in the index
i
15% increase
in political violence incidents recorded in the past 12 month period
i
Over 165,273 political violence events were recorded worldwide from July 2023-June 2024
Methodology
- About
- Indicators
- Definitions & Data Sources
- Rankings
The ACLED Conflict Index uses four indicators to measure conflict levels: deadliness, danger, diffusion, and fragmentation. The values for each indicator are calculated for each country or territory, scaled, and ranked. The top ranked countries overall are experiencing the most severe, complex, and difficult-to-resolve conflicts.
Countries often host multiple discrete conflicts, which can be an accumulation of actions by several armed groups. These groups often have differing political aims, trajectories, and life spans. The Index accounts for all conflicts occurring within countries by examining their combined incidents of violence.
Countries with high incident totals or high conflict fatalities are highly violent and deadly. But incident and fatality counts when evaluated on their own – isolated from aggravating factors and local context – can often distort the size and impact of conflict for different communities and governments. Further, conflicts that have similar rates of intensity are rarely similar in other ways. In Haiti and the Philippines, for example, the conflict event rate is consistent (close to 700 political violence events per year), but the violence impacts their respective communities and governments in very different ways. Conflicts can also differ with respect to the risks faced by different communities. For example, a civilian in Mexico is currently twice as likely to be killed by political violence as a civilian in Syria.
The ACLED Conflict Index is designed to first distinguish conflict risk factors by deadliness, danger, diffusion, and fragmentation, and then to create a relative country ranking based on the combined intensity of risks.
The first version of the Index was launched in January 2023, and an expanded version based on an updated methodology was released in September 2023.
All countries and territories are assessed according to each indicator. Countries are then ranked by their scores for each indicator. See below the table for maps showing the current top 25 countries for each indicator.
Indicator | Measure | Significance |
---|---|---|
Deadliness | How fatal are political violence events? |
The amount of political violence-related fatalities can indicate
how intense conflict is within a state. The Deadliness indicator represents the number of reported fatalities per country in the 12 months preceding the latest update of the Index (e.g. July 2022-July 2023 for the mid-year Index update). |
Danger | How many political violence events are targeted towards civilians? |
Conflicts differ with respect to how much armed groups —
including state actors – prey on civilians. Conflicts that have
a higher rate of civilian violence are likely to continue and
proliferate, in part because armed groups are not facing more
active resistance from other armed entities. The Danger indicator represents the number of violent events targeting civilians per country in the 12 months preceding the latest Index update. |
Diffusion | What proportion of the country experiences a high level of violence? |
Many conflicts can occur in a country simultaneously, adding to
the geographic spread of conflict across states. This measure is
an assessment of the geographic distribution of conflict. Each
country is divided into a 10km-by-10km spatial grid. Grid cells
that have a population of fewer than 100 people are excluded.
Next, ACLED determines how many of a country’s geographic grid
cells experience a high level of violence, defined as at least
10 events per year (representing the top 10% of cases).
The Diffusion indicator represents the proportion of high violence grid cells to total cells (i.e. the percentage of geographic area experiencing high levels of violence) |
Fragmentation | How many non-state armed, organized groups are operating within the conflict? |
The fragmentation of a conflict environment indicates the number
of distinct threats and agendas that are accumulating in a given
context and posing harm to communities and state institutions.
It also indicates the number of distinct political motives and
opportunities to form an armed group. A singular consolidated
armed group can be a serious challenge to governments, but it
can also take part in effective negotiations and engagements. A
highly fragmented environment, in contrast, makes it more
difficult to engage the necessary actors in effective
negotiations and may indicate multiple overlapping conflicts
that are more challenging to simultaneously resolve. The Fragmentation indicator is a count of all armed, organized, active rebel and political militias per country in the last 12 months (excluding unidentified armed groups and including pro-government militias). In addition, a maximum of one communal militia is counted per first level administrative unit per country. |
Definitions
In alphabetical order:
Cartels: Organized armed groups that do not seek to topple the state, but rather seek to control territory for the purpose of extracting exclusive economic benefits via illicit activities.1Lessing, B. (2015). "Logics of Violence in Criminal War." Journal of Conflict Resolution 59.8: 1486-1516. Examples include the Sinaloa Cartel in Mexico.
Event: The fundamental unit of observation in ACLED is referred to as the “event.” Each coded event involves at least one designated actor – e.g. a named rebel group (or, in some cases, an unidentified group), the type of action carried out, a specific named location, a specific date, and other key variables. ACLED currently codes for six event types and 25 sub-event types, both violent and non-violent, that enable analysis of patterns of political violence and demonstration activity.
Executions/Assassinations: The killing of ruling elites, prominent members of society, or important political figures and dissidents. Examples include the assassination of political elites in Yemen and the assassinations of social leaders in Colombia during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Fatalities: In ACLED analysis, the use of the term "fatalities" always refers to reported fatalities recorded in the dataset, per the ACLED fatality methodology.
Gangs: Organized criminal groups whose violent actions (e.g. battles and varied violence against civilians) can have clear political consequences despite a lack of an overt political agenda. They commonly cooperate with local elites and participate in income-seeking behavior, but vary in the degree to which they are organized and at what scale they operate. Examples include the Red Command in Brazil.
Gang Violence: Violence committed by criminal groups without an overt political agenda, also known as gangs (see above). Gang violence is only captured in the ACLED dataset in certain circumstances that have been determined to meet the parameters for inclusion based on the country-context, as outlined in the ACLED methodology brief, Gang Violence: Concepts, Benchmarks, and Coding Rules.
Insurgency: This term refers descriptively to violent activity carried out by an organized, armed, non-state group or groups internally against a governing authority, often to contest control over a territorial area. The use of the term is highly context-specific, and the aims, ideology, intensity, size, and geographic scope of insurgencies will vary.
Militias: The ACLED dataset categorizes two types of militia, political militias and identity militias, and acknowledges the actions of pro-government militias.
- Political Militias: Armed, organized groups with political goals that use violence to advance those goals. Unlike rebel groups, political militias generally do not actively seek to topple or replace the national government using violence, though some are organized in opposition to government authority (e.g. anti-government militias in the United States that at times shift orientation based on the dominant national party or president). These groups often cooperate or ally with various domestic elites as well as external forces, albeit typically without a formal link. Examples include Loyalist militias in Northern Ireland, far-right militias and militant social movements in the United States (such as the Three Percenters or the Proud Boys), and the Bakassi Boys in Nigeria.
- Identity Militias: Armed and violent groups organized around a collective, common feature including community, ethnicity, region, religion, or, in exceptional cases, livelihood. Therefore, identity militias captured in the ACLED dataset include those reported as tribal, clan, communal, ethnic, local, community, religious, and livelihood militias. Violent events involving identity militias are often referred to as communal violence, as these violent groups frequently act locally, in the pursuit of local goals, resources, power, security, and retribution. An armed group claiming to operate on behalf of a larger identity community may be associated with that community, but not represent it (e.g. Luo Ethnic Militia in Kenya or Fulani Ethnic Militia in Nigeria). Recruitment and participation are according to association with the identity of the group. For more, see ACLED Codebook section on Actors.
Mob Violence/Vigilantism: Extrajudicial violence in response to crimes, real, perceived, or not yet committed.2Bateson, R. (2021). "The Politics of Vigilantism." Comparative Political Studies 54.6: 923-955. This can also include the use of violence to punish social infractions or deviations from social norms. Examples include lynchings in Port au Prince, Haiti, or South Africa, as well as pandemic-related attacks against healthcare workers in India.
Organized Criminal Violence: Organized crime is the use of violence by highly organized groups in order to control (often illegal) markets and extract economic benefits. Resources that can motivate such violence can include timber, drugs, diamonds, minerals, and more. The designation of violence in this form is not based on the size of the organization or its scope. Organized violence can be localized but networked over larger spaces - such as the Mafia violence of Southern Italy;or specifically relating to a locality or entire region, such as the various agents and groups engaged in the Mexican drug war.
Political Violence: The use of force by a group with a political purpose or motivation. In analysis, this is a category used to refer collectively to ACLED’s 'Violence against civilians', 'Battles', and 'Explosions/Remote violence' event types, as well as the 'Mob violence' sub-event type of the 'Riot' event type and the 'Excessive force against protesters' sub-event type of the 'Protests' event type. For more, see the ACLED Codebook.
Rebels: Armed, organized non-state actors that seek to challenge and topple or replace the government through the use of violence. These actors are also commonly referred to as insurgents or guerrilla fighters. They commonly coordinate with external forces and political militias/gangs. Examples include the Islamic State in the Greater Sahara, Allied Democratic Forces in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Uganda, and Southern Transitional Council armed forces in Yemen.
Rioters: Individuals who engage in violence during demonstrations and mob violence events. Violence can be directed against people, property, or both. Examples include the 2020 Delhi riots in India and riots against COVID-19 restrictions.
Vigilantes/Mobs: A group of individuals engaging in extrajudicial violence meant to punish a crime, perceived crime, or social infraction.3Bateson, R. (2021). "The Politics of Vigilantism." Comparative Political Studies 54.6: 923-955. Examples include mobs engaging in the justicia comunitaria lynchings in Bolivia, especially within Indigenous communities, and lynching mobs in Bangladesh.
Violence Targeting Civilians: A category that encompasses all events of political violence that target civilians. This includes a broader scope than the violence against civilians event type ('Sexual violence', 'Attack', and 'Abduction/Forced disappearance' sub-event types). It is inclusive of the aforementioned sub-event types, the 'Excessive force against protesters' sub-event type, as well as 'Explosions/Remote violence' and 'Riots' event types which involve civilians or protesters, but excludes the 'Peaceful protest' and 'Protest with intervention' sub-event types. Violence targeting civilians is typically used in ACLED analysis because it reflects the widest scope of violence faced by civilians recorded in the dataset.
Data Sources
ACLED data on political violence from the 12 months preceding the latest version of the Index are used to create the four indicators. All ACLED events are collected using the same methodology, allowing a comparison of event numbers for political violence. Political violence events include the ‘Battles’, ‘Explosions/Remote violence’, and ‘Violence against civilians’ event types, as well as the ‘Mob violence’ and ‘Excessive force against protesters’ sub-event types.
Figures on exposed populations are derived using data from WorldPop.
To determine the overall ranking of countries in the Index, ACLED first ranks each country within each of the four indicators. An average ranking is calculated for each country based on those composite rankings, forming the final, overall ranking of the Index.
A country’s overall ranking on the Index determines its level of conflict. The top 10 countries in the Index are in the ‘extreme’ category, followed by the next 20 countries in the ‘high’ category, and finally the next 20 countries are in the ‘turbulent’ category. The remaining countries are in the ‘low/inactive’ category.
A newer update has been published as of December 2024.
Palestine is the most dangerous country in the world as of July 2024
The most dangerous and violent place in the world at the moment is Palestine — specifically Gaza, with 87% of the Palestinian population exposed to conflict. Palestine is now at the top of the index overall, edging out Myanmar as the most conflicted territory. Whereas Palestine was ranked highest for conflict diffusion in the January index, it is now ranking highest in the diffusion of conflict, deadliness, and danger to civilians. Myanmar continues to host the most armed group fragmentation.
In January 2024, 10 countries hosted extreme levels of conflict, including:
Myanmar, Syria, Palestine, Mexico, Nigeria, Brazil, Colombia, Haiti, Yemen, and Sudan. These countries reflected the previous year’s aggregate patterns. In July 2024, the following 10 countries hosted extreme levels of conflict: Palestine, Myanmar, Syria, Mexico, Nigeria, Colombia, Brazil, Sudan, Cameroon, and Pakistan.
Cameroon and Pakistan rose significantly in the Index, entering into the extreme, whereas previously both hosted ‘high’ levels of conflict. In July, Haiti and Yemen ranked 12 and 13, respectively, making them the only two countries to not remain in the top 10 since January.
How much conflict is occurring in the world as of July 2024?
Over 165,273 political violence events were recorded worldwide during this period, marking a 15% increase from the previous 12 months (July 2023 to June 2024). One in seven people worldwide is estimated to have been exposed to conflict between July 2023 and 2024.
In previous years, the increase in conflict has been stark. During the period of July 2020 to June 2021, ACLED records 100,272 events and 13% global exposure to conflict. The massive increase in four years, which sits at 64%, can be explained by three very large conflicts beginning or restarting during that time — Ukraine, Gaza, and Myanmar — coupled with continued violence in many other countries with high rates of conflict — including Sudan, Mexico, Yemen, and Sahel countries. The event numbers are proliferating, as are the number of armed groups involved in violence.
However, the rate of exposure has stayed relatively stable during this period, moving from 13% to 14% overall (with a short increase last year to 17%). Why is this the case? Partially, it relates to the clustering of conflicts: Event numbers can rise, but unless conflict is diffusing and occurring in new spaces, the same people are exposed. This repeated exposure suggests that a significant part of the global population is bearing the intense cost of rising violent conflict, while many more are indirectly affected.
Where is conflict happening as of July 2024?
In the past 12 months, the most violent country measured by event count is Ukraine, averaging over 791 political violence incidents per week and accounting for 26% of all political violence events occurring in the past year. Ukraine was also the deadliest, with over 37,303 recorded fatalities in the past year. But now Palestine ranks highest in deadliness, conflict diffusion, and danger to civilians: 39,787 people were reportedly killed since July 2023, of which 35,201 are recorded as civilian deaths. As previously noted, 87% of the population is exposed to extreme violence, and over 16,938 conflict events occurred in Palestine during these 12 months.
Myanmar continues to host the highest number of non-state armed groups. Local militias have frequently emerged to defend communities and engage in the ongoing conflict, making it the top-ranked country for fragmentation. More than 1,500 distinct actors have been recorded, accounting for 45% of all non-state armed groups active globally in the past 12 months.
Rank | Country | Index Level | Change Category | Change Rate |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Palestine | Extreme | Consistently concerning | +2 |
2 | Myanmar | Extreme | Consistently concerning | -1 |
3 | Syria | Extreme | Consistently concerning | -1 |
4 | Mexico | Extreme | Consistently concerning | 0 |
5 | Nigeria | Extreme | Consistently concerning | 0 |
6 | Brazil | Extreme | Consistently concerning | 0 |
6 | Colombia | Extreme | Consistently concerning | +1 |
8 | Sudan | Extreme | Consistently concerning | +2 |
9 | Cameroon | Extreme | Worsening | +16 |
10 | Pakistan | Extreme | Worsening | +4 |
11 | Democratic Republic of Congo | High | Consistently concerning | 0 |
12 | Haiti | High | Improving | -4 |
13 | Yemen | High | Improving | -4 |
14 | India | High | Consistently concerning | +1 |
15 | Ukraine | High | Consistently concerning | -2 |
16 | Iraq | High | Consistently concerning | -4 |
17 | Ethiopia | High | Consistently concerning | +5 |
18 | Mali | High | Consistently concerning | -3 |
19 | Bangladesh | High | Consistently concerning | -2 |
20 | Lebanon | High | Worsening | +11 |
21 | Israel | High | Consistently concerning | +1 |
22 | Jamaica | High | Consistently concerning | -1 |
23 | Somalia | High | Consistently concerning | +4 |
24 | Burkina Faso | High | Consistently concerning | -7 |
25 | Guatemala | High | Consistently concerning | -1 |
26 | Kenya | High | Consistently concerning | -7 |
27 | Honduras | High | Consistently concerning | -7 |
28 | Russia | High | Worsening | +8 |
29 | Philippines | High | Consistently concerning | -2 |
30 | Trinidad and Tobago | High | Consistently concerning | 0 |
31 | Afghanistan | Turbulent | Improving | -6 |
32 | Venezuela | Turbulent | Improving | -5 |
33 | Madagascar | Turbulent | Consistent | +5 |
34 | Burundi | Turbulent | Consistent | -2 |
34 | Puerto Rico | Turbulent | Consistent | +5 |
36 | South Africa | Turbulent | Consistent | -3 |
37 | Central African Republic | Turbulent | Consistent | -3 |
38 | South Sudan | Turbulent | Consistent | -1 |
39 | Niger | Turbulent | Consistent | -5 |
39 | Ecuador | Turbulent | Consistent | +1 |
41 | Indonesia | Turbulent | Consistent | +3 |
42 | Libya | Turbulent | Worsening | +10 |
43 | Benin | Turbulent | Consistent | 0 |
44 | Uganda | Turbulent | Consistent | -2 |
45 | Turkey | Turbulent | Consistent | -4 |
46 | Mozambique | Turbulent | Consistent | -1 |
47 | Ghana | Turbulent | Worsening | +6 |
48 | Iran | Turbulent | Consistent | -2 |
49 | Chad | Turbulent | Consistent | 0 |
50 | Peru | Turbulent | Worsening | +4 |
Are conflict levels worsening or improving as of July 2024?
As of July 2024, and in comparison to the last year and the past five years, conflict rates continue to worsen. Four countries have seen improvements to their ACLED Conflict Index rankings — Afghanistan, Venezuela, Yemen, and Haiti — and seven have worsened: Pakistan, Peru, Ghana, Russia, Libya, Lebanon, and Cameroon. Overall, of the 50 countries ranked at the top of the index, well over half — 39 — are currently experiencing sustained or escalating levels of conflict.
Can we predict change?
The index aggregates several characteristics of violence sensitive to change, allowing us to robustly assess the likely trajectory of conflict. In January, we expected that Sudan, Haiti, Yemen, and Mexico would likely worsen in the following six months, and Nigeria may improve. Both Haiti and Yemen improved slightly, while Sudan worsened and Mexico remained extremely violent but occupies the same position (at no. 4). Yemen was expected to continue to experience the negative reverberations from the Gaza conflict, a crisis which the ruling Houthis have adapted for their benefit. Haiti reached a crescendo in early 2024, and temporary cooperation and alignment between contesting gangs have somewhat stabilized Haiti’s disorder.
ACLED produces monthly conflict forecasts at the national and subnational levels in our Conflict Alert System (CAST). This system is highly accurate as to the trajectory of events in very violent countries. For example, on average over the last six months, CAST has predicted the number and type of events within 4% accuracy in half of the ‘extreme’ category countries: Brazil, Mexico, Nigeria, and Colombia.
Note: Previous index results (from January 2024 and July 2023) address additional questions, including:
Ukraine decreased on the list. Why?
Conflict rates and media attention are not correlated. Why?
How have conflicts changed?
Visit the ACLED Conflict Index home page for more information and previous reports.
Downloads & Tools
Access a data file with ACLED Conflict Index results for all countries and territories, including Index level, overall Index ranking, and each individual Index indicator score. To access the underlying ACLED event data, use our data export tool or curated data files.
Interactive Conflict Index Dashboard
For more information about past and present Index results, use our interactive dashboard to access additional tools, resources, and data downloads. Use of the tool requires registration for a free account.